Lindsay Lohan, 25, is set to appear in the January issue of Playboy Magazine.
The plans for posing were said to have been in the works for months, as Playboy initially offered Lohan $750 thousand, which she turned down due to wanting $1 million, according to TMZ. However an unknown amount was eventually agreed on.
The shooting for the spread has already begun, but Hefner's unhappiness with the first shots called for a new session.
Lohan will posing dressed in lingerie and will not be nude.
Oh, Lindsay, Lindsay, Lindsay.....Where do I begin? Every time you think she's just about to pull it together and turn things around, she does something else that makes you go "WTF?!"
We all know anyone that wants to be taken seriously as an actress, and be known not solely for their looks, but for their talent, will never pose for Playboy. I think Lindsay knows this as well, since she won't be in her birthday suit for the shoot. We can pretty much bet that wasn't Hef's idea, because he likes his models wearing nothing but a smile.
However, this non nude posing in a men's magazine is what's baffling. Who poses for Playboy and doesn't appear naked? It defeats the purpose. It seems like she's trying to make some much needed cash while trying to salvage what little is left of her modesty at the same time. It comes off as desperate, especially since we've already seen pics of Lindsay's lady parts before. If you're not comfortable with being nude, then you shouldn't be going that route in the first place.
I'm not alone when I say LiLo is past her prime. Judging by her latest courtroom photos, she's hardly something to look at now then a few years ago. However, people would have still purchased the mag just out of sheer curiosity of seeing her naked. But now I don't see the point now.
I guess we'll never know the answer to real question here: "Do the curtains match the drapes?"
No comments:
Post a Comment